On Dr. Ashok Mitra

SAHMAT Statement on Lenin Statue Vandalism 06-03-2018

The vandalism against Lenin's statue in India's north-eastern state of Tripura by power-drunk Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) workers is most reprehensible. Apart from his own epic role, Lenin was a friend of India's national movement, had his own preferred line on national movements in colonial countries, which was a source of strength to the Indian national movement.

This kind of violence, specially after an electoral victory, has no place in a democracy and needs to be resisted by democratic means.

Irfan Habib       
Anil Nauriya
Arjun Dev
B.P.Sahu
D N Jha
Iqtidar Alam Khan   
K M Shrimali   
Lata Singh
Prabhat Shukla
R C Thakran     
Shireen Moosvi
Suvira Jaiswal 
Vishwamohan Jha     
R P Bahuguna 
K L Tuteja
Rajesh Singh     
Kesavan Veluthat     
A K Sinha
Santosh Rai     
Shalin Jain       
H C Satyarthi
V Ramakrishna
Ramakrishna Chatterjee   
Arun Bandopadhyaya
S Z H Jafri       
Vivan Sundaram     
Prabhat Patnaik
Mushirul Hasan
Mihir Bhattacharya 
Sashi Kumar
Ram Rahman 
Anil Bhatti
Archana Prasad       
C P Chandrasekhar 
Geeta Kapur   
Dinesh Abrol
Indira Chandrasekhar       
Jayati Ghosh   
M K Raina
Madangopal Singh   
Madhu Prasad
V.N. Shukla
B.N. Singh
Padmlata Thakur 
Malini Bhattacharya
N K Sharma     
Nina Rao 
Parthiv Shah   
Praveen Jha
Rahul Verma   
Saeed MIrza
Shakti Kak       
Sohail Hashmi
Ranbir Singh Dahiya
Saba Hasan
Amarjit Chandan
Kabir Shah
Omprakash Sharma
Raj Chauhan
Shivadas Puthiyakovilakam
Prasanna Kumar
Abdul Mabood
Rakesh Wadhwa
Asif Naqvi
Asghar Wajahat
Iqbal Baig
Vikas Rawal   
Indira Arjun Dev
Zoya Hasan     
C P Bhambri                       
Rakesh Batabyal     
Amiya Kumar Bagchi
Rekha Awasthi
Nadeem Rezavi
MMP Singh
Ramesh Rawat
Rajinder Arora
Rajni Arora
Dr Sunilam
Sudhir Chandra
Ataullah
Abhilasha Kumari
Manish Agarwal
Alok Rai
Amar Farooqui
Bindu Batra
MohanKumawat
Hasan Imam Syed Mohammed
Rakesh Manchanda
Manoj Kulkarni
Satyendra Kumar
Arvind Kumar
Aban Raza
Mahavir Sharma
Daya Ram
Chamarthi Sadasiva
Rajesh Kumar
Thiagarajan Jayaraman
Rajendra Sharma
Msazaad Azaad
Md. Saood Khan
Bhimrao Chikate
Arun Mishra
Vandana Rag
Anu Arunima
Badal Saroj
PJ Cherian
Shakeel Qureshi
Ramakumar Ram
Bhim HGVS
Vineet Kohli
Satnam Singh
VK Cherian
Parvez Ahmed
Nalini Taneja
Asad Zaidi
Vijoo Krishnan
Nikhil Kumar
Abinash DC
Alok Bajpai
Jawari Mal Parakh
Surya Narayan
Pradeep Bhattacharya
Venkatasubramanian Kuppuswami
Rajeev Dhavan
Renu Sharma
Durveysh M Sehrawat
Aniket Alam
Brij Tankha
Anjali Deshpande
Subodh Lal
Durgaprasad Agarwal
Maha Bir Sarwar
Valay Singh
Kripal Singh Mandloi
Ravi K
Ovais Sultan Khan
Frans Manjali
Ali Javed
Samita Gupta
Rajpal Dahiya
Mangat Ram Shastri
Amitava Das
Tarun Bhartiya
Nissim Sadolikar
SL Vasanthakumar
Dulichand Borda
Subhabrato Roy
Abha Dev Habib
Ranbir Sinh
Harendra Singh
Samar Dhaliwal
Aditi Chowdhury
Shalu Nigam
Pratap Pandey
Amit Kundu
Venktesh Athreya
Chamarthi Sadasiva
Salim Saboowalla
S.K. Das
Anil Kumar
Arindam Dasgupta
Indranil Chowdhury
Mariam Dhawale
Sadiq Zafar
Chandana Dey
Badri Raina
Ayesha Kidwai
JN Sinha
O.P. Jaiswal
Sukumar Murlidharan
Sukriti Ray
Ahmar Raza
Sunita Kumari
Aroop Sen
Girish
Deepti Deepu
Vikas Bajpai
Veer Munshi
Anand K. Sahay
Maya K. Rao
Nakul Singh Sawhney
Kiran Shaheen
Malavika Kasturi
Jawed Naqvi
Upendra Trivedi
Zarina Bhatty
Najib Anwar
Amrendra Kumar Thakur
Ghayur Alam
Man Mohan
Chaman Lal
Anil Kumar Singh
Vimal Paliwal
Nandita Narain
Sandhya Deve┼Ťan



29th Safdar Hashmi Memorial (Report)

The setting up of Safdr Hashmi Memorial Trust (Sahmat) was a spontaneous and organic response to the murder of a street theater activist, known for his commitment to the democratic and secular principles that undergirded the promise of Indian independence. Since it came in to being in 1989, Sahmat has stood for preserving the very values that defined Safdar’s public work. And for those of us, who’s path has ever crossed Delhi knows and looks forward to the Safdar Hashmi Memorial Day on 1st January every year.

This year, the Safdar Evening was themed around the 25th anniversary of the Babri Masjid Demolition. The outpouring of grief and rage at Safdar’s death coincided with a transformational shift in Indian politics, manifest most notably in the rise of a seditious and pernicious Hindutva ideology. In a matter of months, if not weeks, artists, actors, writers and other cultural figures coalesced around an informal banner that Sahmat offered and used their cultural expressions to proffer a critique of the ideology of hate and discrimination. However, by 1992, the very idea of India as a composite society was upended on its head when a swath of kar sevaks brought down the “disputed” structure of Babri Mosque in Ayodhya with absolute impunity. The ensuing confusion and shock left little room for a concerted effort. Despite that, Sahmat brought a delegation together and sent representation to the then President of India while at the same time mobilizing artists to produce a critical response to the demolition on the streets of Delhi. An exhibition followed which travelled to Ayodhya, among other places, in those troubled times.

The story of the three exhibitions on display at the Vitthalbhai Patel House, where Sahmat’s event has taken place for years, tells the story of India since that day. “Hum Sab Ayodhya”- the exhibition organized close on the heels of the demolition, was showcased on one end of the room. The exhibition closely follows the history of Ayodhya and falsifies the myopic and wholly contrived narrative of the Ram Janmabhoomi movement, by bringing to surface the syncretic traditions that made Ayodhya’s history and that of its surroundings. However, in this age of love-jihad, beef lynchings and caste flare ups over works of cinema, it was hard to anticipate the many other vicious forces that Babri demolition would unleash. And this is the crucial difference that marked “Hum Sab Ayodhya” from this year’s exhibition, “Beyond Dispute: Landscapes of Dissent”. The latter explores the crevices that run [and divide] fault line- like the indian society today. Beyond Dispute calls upon artists to reflect on the myriad ways in which the same degree of violence has been unleashed in our times whose moorings may seem different but contribute to the same environment of insular and exclusionary politics. With almost 50 artists working through different mediums, the new Sahmat exhibition unravels the politics of our times in the most vivid and yet, poignant ways. It goes far beyond the question of the Hindu-Muslim divide and brings to relief contestations around pedagogy and education, culinary and sartorial choices, conflicts and separatist tendencies, Dalit marginalization and mass displacement to name just few. It is apt to return to the editorial title that the Times of India carried out on the day after the demolition – The Republic Besmirched. Collectively these 60- odd works make the point about how a republic was lost, and a thrust for a new, undesirable one commenced on that fateful day of 1992.

The central panel of the exhibit also displayed an immense installation art with three dome like structures looming above the works, suspended in air as a constant specter.

The last exhibit, Dharti ke Laal, was a result of a call given by noted photographer Ram Rahman. In his call Rahman asked young photographers to directly engage with the ongoing agrarian crisis and represent the blazing fields in the portrait medium. 27 photographers participated in this project to produce over 150 powerful portraits that were mostly composed during the farmer’s maha padyatra to Delhi in November, 2017. These images mounted in the montage format, collectively tell the story of one of India’s most shameful act of denial where lakhs of farmers have been forced to take their lives and many more millions have abandoned their hearth and homes, to be thrown into further precarity. The images of widows sitting with the picture of their dead husbands awaiting compensation or the images of the sparse kitchens of the veritable food-producers collectively convey a message of indignation and state complicity.

Releasing the SAHMAT Gandhi Calendar for 2018, noted historian Mahmoud Mamdani remarked that the task of our times is to bring the enemy into the realm of an adversary. An adversary, he says, is one that can be engaged with an intention of reforming and an enemy remains just that; a formless being upon whom only the logic of crime and punishment applies. He was accompanied at the calendar release with his partner and film maker, Mira Nair.

Sahmat programme commenced with screening  Virender Saini’s 1993 movie “Ayodhya”  the 40 minute film that was produced in 1993 itself underlines the plurality and harmony of the everyday lived life of the ancient city of Ayodhya. The director was present on the occasion and the cultural performances were interspersed with eyewitness accounts from 6th December 1992. Suman Gupta a senior correspondent of Faizabad based paper Jan Morcha was a key eyewitness of the events along with several other journalists on the 6 th of December 1992. She along with another senior journalist Ruchira Gupta narrated the horrifying incidents of that dreadful day and how in a planned manner the Masjid was brought down by Kar Sevaks and the scores of journalist were threatened, molested and have beaten up.

The day as usual had started with street theater performances by Bigul, and Jatan Natya Kendra, Haryana,  renditions of revolutionary poems as well as five songs on Ram which the Jan Natya Manch- Kurukshetra performed to relay the multiplicity of meanings that the god has for different classes and communities. A group of young artists from Pune performed a short play “ Main Safdar Hoon”.

The music programme began with the singing of young artist Arman Ali Develvi and the evening ended with powerful performances by folk and sufi artists, Madan Gopal Singh, Jasbir Jassi and Rabbi Shergill who regaled the audience with the classic Sufi-poetry.

As has become a convention by now SAHMAT released two books in Hindi.  Do Sarfrosh Shayar ( Two Revolutionary Poets) by Wakar Siddiqui,  is an account of the lives of famous revolutionaries Ram Prasad Bismil and Ashfaqulla Khan who were hanged for being involved in the Kakori Case. Their lives, family backgrounds and poetry is made available in Hindustani for the first-time. The second book Azadi Ke Sattar Saal ( Seventy Years of Indian Freedom ) edited by Rajendra Sharma contains essays by Irfan Habib, Gopal Gandhi, Ashok Vajpeyi, Anil Sadgopal

( all organized by SAHMAT)  as lectures marking 70 years of Indian Independence). Also included in the book are articles by Prabhat Patnaik, Amar Farooqui, Shubha, Subhash Gatade and Rajendra Sharma. The books were released by poet Manmohan.  

29th Safdar Hashmi Memorial


Four lectures on "Karl Marx's Capital and the Present" by Prof. C.P. Chandrasekhar

To commemorate 150 Years of Capital, Vol. 1
‘Karl Marx’s Capital & the Present’
Four lectures by Prof. C.P. Chandrasekhar

​Gulmohar Hall, India Habitat Centre, New Delhi

India Against Hate: ARTISTS DISSENT Sunday, 27 August 2017


INDIA AGAINST HATE / NAFRAT KE KHILAF
ARTISTS DISSENT

On Sunday, 27th August, 4.30 pm onwards,
at 29 Ferozeshah Road (near Mandi House circle) 

​Join us in this nation wide protest against 
the violence unleashed by hate speech and hate crimes.


The evening's programme will include:

- A visual signature campaign: register your dissent by getting yourself photographed against a              photowall/backdrop designed by artists.
- Newly made presentations and installations by art students from across the city.
- A special display of banners and posters.
- Readings, recitals, performances by poets, writers, artists, musicians.  


SAHMAT, 29 Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi 110 001
E sahmat8@yahoo.com  T (+91-11) 23381276 / 23070787

Statement against proposed vandalism of Ramkinkar Baij’s artwork, 11-08-2017

Artists and Creative Community of India are aghast at the vandalism proposed against the artwork of one India's greatest artists by a representative of the BJP government in Guwahati. Ramkinkar Baij pioneered the modern movement in mid-twentieth century India. He was dedicated to the person and philosophy of Mahatma Gandhi, as he was to the adivasi communities and subaltern figures in the ethos he inhabited. He sought to find a form for this in several smaller sculptures of the Mahatma. This large sculpture was made by his students under Ramkinkar's mentorship.
The rightwing ideology of the present government works with dangerous ignorance; no understanding of contemporary cultural values, none of any kind of aesthetic criteria. This is well known to the practicing artists of India. And they have resisted the pernicious spread of this ideology at every instance in the past 25 years and more. Being presently in power, the RSS-BJP's representatives can now hold forth on the formal qualities of an artwork--in this case by a master artist. And decide to demolish what they cannot comprehend. This is like much else that is happening in India's civil and political society; like taking over of the cultural and academic institutions.
Until now Indian artists and Creative Community have, on the whole, not submitted to such an appalling and dangerous tendency. Today, the defence of an icon: the defence of this Ramkinkar-guided sculpture of Mahatma Gandhi. Henceforth, and always, the defense of art and its experimental freedoms; of historical knowledge and its emancipatory possibilities. We can together shame  the communal and rightwing ideology of this government; together we can prevent them winning any of their vulgar victories. Artists Dissent.

Vivan Sundaram
Ram Rahman
Geeta Kapur
Tushar Joag
Sharmila Samant
Veer Munshi
Inder Salim
Parthiv Shah
Shakuntala Kulkarni
Ananya Vajpeyi
Sunil Kothari
Gulammohammed Sheikh
Nilima Sheikh
Rashmi Kaleka
Mithu Sen
Bharti Kher
Subodh Gupta
Nikhil Kumar
Vijay Pratap
Rajni Bhagat
Rajinder Arora
Pushpamala N.
Nirmalangshu Mukherji 
Sunil Gupta
Kamlesh Kumar Kohli
Sudhir Chandra
Shukla Sawant
Meera Devidayal
Anubhav Pradhan
Bhairabi Prasad Sahu
Mangalesh Dabral
Gayatri Sinha

Statement by Academics, Artists and Cultural Activists condemning the censorship of Amartya Sen Film, 13.7.2017

We are shocked and angered by the recent Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) demand that certain words be excised from a film based on the work of the Nobel laureate economist Amartya Sen. The movie is titled after Sen’s 2005 work, The Argumentative Indian, which was widely acknowledged for its deep and authentic explorations of India’s traditions of public debate.

 The CBFC has reportedly demanded that certain words used by Sen and other scholars and public intellectuals interviewed in the film should be bleeped out if it is to be granted certification for public exhibition. These words include “cow”, “Hindutva view of India”, “Hindu India” and “Gujarat”. The CBFC’s exertions under its current chair have long crossed the line from farce to tragedy. Occasional efforts to bring it to its senses, such as the stern judicial reprimand handed down in the Udta Punjab case, seem to have no more than transient effect. With its diktat on The Argumentative Indian, the CBFC shows yet again that its anxiety to protect the sensitivities of the political regime, overwhelm any manner of commitment to the Constitution and the law. At risk in this plunge into absurdity, are our most valuable traditions of free speech and debate.

Irfan Habib
Ashok Mitra
Romila Thapar
Shyam Benegal
Amiya Kumar Bagchi
Saeed Mirza
Anand Patwardhan
Prabhat Patnaik
Mihir Bhattacharya
Ram Rahman
Parthiv Shah
Madangopal Singh
Vivan Sundaram
Nilima Sheikh
Sohail Hashmi
Geeta Kapur
Anil Chandra
Kumi Chandra
M.K.Raina
Gulammohammad Sheikh
Rajni Arora
Jahar Kanungo
Rajinder Arora
D. N. Jha
Sashi Kumar
Shireen Moosvi
K.M.Shrimali
Arjun Dev
Anil Bhatti
M.M.P. Singh
Rekha Awasthi
Amir Rizvi
P.K.Shukla
Lata Singh
Dinesh Abrol
Archana Prasad
Githa Hariharan
Kumkum Sangari
Rakhshanda Jalil
Kasim Sait
Virendra Saini
Mridula Mukherjee
Zoya Hasan
C.P.Chandrasekhar
Aditya Mukherjee
Ashok Nath Basu
Indira Chandrasekhar
Vishwa Mohan Jha
Sukumar Muralidharan
Sadanand Menon
A.J.Jawad
Ananya Vajpeyi
Malini Bhattacharya
Atlury Murali
Vikas Rawal
Javed Anand
Teesta Setalvad
K.L.Tuteja
Gopinath Ravindran
Sania Hashmi
Mohan Kumawat
Iqtidar Alam Khan
Ishrat Alam
Tani Bhargav
Rajeev Bhargav
Ramesh Rawat
Nadeem Rezavi
Shamim Akhtar
Indira Arjun Dev
Mohan Rao
Jayati Ghosh
Nancy Adajania
Veer Munshi
Abhilasha Kumari
Romi Khosla
Neeraj Malik
Javed Malick
Zafar Agha
Madhu Prasad
Kalpana Sahni
Amar Farooqui
B.P.Sahu
R.P.Bahuguna
Shakti Kak
Sarah Hashmi
Moggallan Bharti
Rahul Verma
N.K.Sharma
Manglesh Dabral
Geeta Seshu
Nasreen Fazalbhoy
Jai Shankar Agarwala
Indira Chandrasekhar-mumbai, bengaluru
Ritambhara Shastri


SAHMAT New Books



New Book: The October Revolution and the Present : 4 Lectures by Prabhat Patnaik


ISBN: 978-93-80536-58-3
Price: Rs. 80/-
Please write to: sahmat8@yahoo.com
SAHMAT, 29 Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi-110001.
Tel-23381276/23070787

Protest outrageous attack on freedom, 09-11-2016

Protest outrageous attack on freedom

We condemn the charges filed by the Chhattisgarh state police against members of a fact-finding team that visited the Bastar region in May this year. Those charged for the murder of Shamnath Baghel, a local political leader include Nandini Sundar and Archana Prasad, professors at Delhi University and the Jawaharlal Nehru University, Vineet Tiwari of the Joshi Adhikari Foundation, Sanjay Parate, state secretary of the CPI(M) and Manju Kawasi of the CPI, a village sarpanch from Sukma district.

Shamnath Baghel, murdered last Friday, was head of a vigilante group that was often deployed by the Chhattisgarh police in search and cordon operations. Its often lawless conduct had drawn the justified criticism of the May fact-finding team. In its report, which was widely circulated over the internet, the team called for greater attention to the plight of ordinary citizens caught in the crossfire between the Maoists and state-sponsored vigilantes.

We deplore the atmosphere of intolerance for the advocacy of human rights, typified by the burning an effigy of well-known activists a fortnight back, by members of the police force. This action followed a finding by the Central Bureau of Investigation that members of the police force – and the so-called volunteers or “special police officers” they recruited – were responsible for an incident of arson in Tadmedla village of Sukma district, in which 160 dwellings were burnt. The incident was blamed on Maoist insurgents but the CBI finding of police culpability came after an investigation ordered by the High Court.

We demand that the charges be dropped at once. We also urge authorities in Chhattisgarh to pay special attention to the safety and security of the two local political activists who have been charged.

The charges brought by the Chhattisgarh police are a transparent effort to intimidate independent civic initiatives that focus public attention particularly on the problems of the state’s adivasi communities. Professors Nandini Sundar and Archana Prasad who have long had a research commitment in this area, have often been subject to intrusive surveillance and intimidation on their visits to the Bastar region.

We call upon the academic community in Delhi and elsewhere to step up to protest this outrageous attack on freedom.

Irfan Habib
Vivan Sundaram
Prabhat Patnaik
Mushirul Hasan
Mihir Bhattacharya
Sashi Kumar
Ram Rahman
Sukumar Muralidharan
Abhilasha Kumari
Aditya Mukherjee
Amar Farooqui
Anil Bhatti                               
Arjun Dev                   
B P Sahu
Badri Raina                
Biswamoy Pati                       
C P Chandrasekhar
Chanchal Chauhan
Shamim Akhtar
Syed Ali Nadeem Rezawi
D N Jha
Indira ArjunDev                      
Indira Chandrasekhar
Iqtidar Alam Khan      
Ishrat Alam
Jauhar Kanungo
Javed Malick             
Jayati Ghosh
K M Shrimali              
Lata Singh
Lima Kanungo            
M K Raina
Madangopal Singh
Madhu Prasad                       
Malini Bhattacharya
Megha Kumar
Mridula Mukherjee
N K Sharma               
Neeraj Malick             
Nina Rao
Parthiv Shah
Prabhat Shukla                      
Pushpamala N
Rahul Verma              
ShireenMoosvi
Sohail Hashmi
Suvira Jaiswal            
Utsa Patnaik
Veer Munshi               
Virendra Saini            
Vishwamohan Jha     
Zoya Hasan

SAHMAT Statement on censorship of NDTV, 05-11-2016

We strongly condemn the arbitrary and vindictive action by the Narendra Modi government, ordering the popular Hindi news broadcaster NDTV-India off the air for a twenty-four hour period. NDTV-India has been accused of violating a 2015 amendment to the cable TV rules, which obliged news broadcasters to restrict live reporting of anti-terrorism operations and confine themselves to facts revealed in “periodic” briefings by “designated” officials of the “appropriate” government.
 
There can be no more vaguely worded restraint than this on media reporting and the public right to know. Clearly, the intent here is to forcibly enforce the model of media irrationality and hyper-chauvinism that the Modi government has actively promoted ever since it assumed office. The alleged violations by NDTV-India, according to the official statement from an inquiry by the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, include reporting that the terrorist intruders into the Pathankot air-base in January this year, had managed to approach the near vicinity of an arms depot.
 
We learn that an NDTV-India reporter allowed most proximate access to the operational theatre by security forces, mentioned the possibility of the terrorist intruders gaining access to the arms depot within the Pathankot air-base. The news broadcast then made the inference that the task of neutralising would become more complicated if the terrorist intruders actually did gain access to the arms depot.
 
These points, we may be permitted to say, would be obvious to the meanest intelligence. To say that Indian media consumers should be deprived of this information because it could promote an alien terrorist enterprise is to insult them.NDTV-India is also accused of reporting the presence of a school and civilians on the airbase, not to mention revealing that there were strategic investments such as jet fighters within the Pathankot air-base.
 
Again, there is a gross insult to the awareness of the average Indian citizen here.
We reiterate that the Modi government’s vindictive action is an assault on the peoples’ right to know. We need hardly remind the public of the confused and chaotic response of the government after the first shots were fired in the terrorist intrusion in Pathankot. These included an ill-informed and unfounded statement from the Union Home Minister, Rajnath Singh, claiming that the attack had been repulsed, when there were still intruders alive within the air-base, adequately equipped to carry on their mission for another 36 hours.
 
We also remind the Modi government that clamping down on the media will not efface public memories of its monumental misstep in inviting a team from Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) to visit the Pathankot air-base in an obviously misguided effort at gaining international endorsement for India’s fight against terrorism.
 
An effective fight requires a strong domestic consensus. By attacking the media and the public right to know, the Modi government seriously undermines this possibility.

SAHMAT Statement on attack on Freedom of Expression

SAHMAT
Safdar Hashmi Memorial Trust
29, Feroze Shah Road,New Delhi-110001
Telephone- 23381276/ 23070787
e-mail-sahmat8@yahoo.com
7.10.2016

The right-wing activists are using intimidatory tactics with impunity to muzzle freedom of expression and performances on a regular basis.

Soon after the incident in Central University in Haryana where the performance of Mahasweta Devi’s play came under attack, the critically acclaimed actor Nawazuddin Siddiqui was not allowed to take to stage on October 6 at Budhana ,West U.P.by the Shiv Sena activists fully backed by the BJP in Western Uttar Pradesh.

Earlier on October 4, the IPTA Conference in Bhopal was disrupted when a group of slogan-shouting activists barged  into an auditorium and disrupted the event stating that the noted film director M.S.Sathyu had no right to voice his opinion on the handling of the Indo-Pak relations.

We unequivocally condemn this alarming series of incidents and appeal to all democratic organisations and individuals to resist all such attempts.

Vivan Sundaram
Prabhat Patnaik
Mihir Bhattacharya
SaeedMirza
Sashi Kumar
Ram Rahman
Sukumar Muralidharan
Abhilasha Kumari
Sania Hashmi
Akila Jayaraman
Amar Farooqui
Amol Saghar
Anil Bhatti                 
Anil Chandra
Archana Prasad                      
Arjun Dev                  
Arpana Caur               
Badri Raina                
Biswamoy Pati                       
C P Chandrasekhar
Chanchal Chauhan
Chandana Mathur
D N Jha
Dinesh Abrol
GeetaKapur    
Indira ArjunDev                    
Indira Chandrasekhar
Jauhar Kanungo
Jayati Ghosh
K M Shrimali             
Lata Singh
Lima Kanungo                       
M K Raina
Madangopal Singh
Madhu Prasad            
Malini Bhattacharya
N K Sharma               
Nina Rao
Parthiv Shah
MMP Singh
Praveen Jha
RajinderArora            
Romi Khosla
S Kalidas
Saif Mahmood
ShireenMoosvi
Sohail Hashmi
Utsa Patnaik
Virendra Saini            
Vishwamohan Jha      
ZoyaHasan
N.D.Jayaprakash
Imrana Qadeer
Jawrimal Parakh

Rekha Awasthi

Statement on attack on Central University Haryana

SAHMAT
Safdar Hashmi Memorial Trust
29, Feroze Shah Road,New Delhi-110001
Telephone- 23381276/ 23070787
e-mail-sahmat8@yahoo.com
sahmat.org
Date 3.10.2016

That the staging of a play written by the renowned writer and activist, Mahasweta Devi, would lead to questions, inquiry and ‘trouble’ for two teachers of the English department of the Central University of Haryana, Snehsata and Manoj Kumar is very hard to digest and must be condemned in the strongest of terms.

The University has “apologised” to activists of the Akhil Bhartiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) but its activists continue to hound the administration and students/teachers involved with the staging of Draupadi by Mahasweta Devi. The misplaced and entirely ridiculous charge is that a scene in the play is ‘anti-national’, which is the new catch-all phrase to bundle all those even slightly opposed to the BJP-RSS or even holding independent views.

We are shocked by this hounding of the late Mahasweta Devi, who died recently and was praised by even senior BJP leaders as they condoled her death. The BJP President Mr Amit Shah went to the extent of saying; “Her contribution to Indian literature is peerless, Rudali and Hajar Churashir Maa were my personal favorites.”

This is again an attack by the ABVP on the freedom of expression in a  central University. We condemn this latest assault and express solidarity with the professors being hounded.

Vivan Sundaram
Prabhat Patnaik
Mihir Bhattacharya
SaeedMirza
Sashi Kumar
Ram Rahman
Sukumar Muralidharan
Abhilasha Kumari
Sania Hashmi
Akila Jayaraman
Amar Farooqui
Amol Saghar
Anil Bhatti                 
Anil Chandra
Archana Prasad                      
Arjun Dev                  
Arpana Caur               
Badri Raina                
Biswamoy Pati                       
C P Chandrasekhar
Chanchal Chauhan
Chandana Mathur
D N Jha
Dinesh Abrol
GeetaKapur    
Indira ArjunDev                    
Indira Chandrasekhar
Jauhar Kanungo
Jayati Ghosh
K M Shrimali             
Lata Singh
Lima Kanungo                       
M K Raina
Madangopal Singh
Madhu Prasad            
Malini Bhattacharya
N K Sharma               
Nina Rao
Parthiv Shah
MMP Singh
Praveen Jha
RajinderArora            
Romi Khosla
S Kalidas
Saif Mahmood
ShireenMoosvi
Sohail Hashmi
Utsa Patnaik
Virendra Saini            
Vishwamohan Jha      
ZoyaHasan
N.D.Jayaprakash
Imrana Qadeer
Jawrimal Parakh

Rekha Awasthi 

PRESS RELEASE OPPOSING THE NEO-LIBERAL THRUST IN EDUCATION

Date: 08-08-2009
The Safdar Hashmi Memorial Trust held a one day seminar Against the Neo-Liberal Thrust that is being given to the education policy by the UPA government. The seminar focused on the recently passed Right to Education Bill and the hundred days agenda of the new HRD minister Kapil Sibal.

Eminent educationists, teachers from Central Universities , Representatives of School and College Teachers’Associations attended the seminar and highlighted the dangers of the UPAs agenda in school and higher education.

The inagural session of the seminar was addressed by Sitaram Yechury, Prabhat Patnaik ( Jawaharlal Nehru University ), Muchkund Dubey (President, Council for Social Development), Yashpal and Zoya Hasan (National Commission for Minorities). All speakers in this session spoke of the need for having an equitable and publically funded educational system which also met the need of socially and economically disadvantaged groups.

Prof Patnaik stated that the university needed to be oriented towards intellectual engangagement which was not subservient to the market. This could not be achieved without fighting the neo-liberal context. Sitaram Yechury hightlighted the need for expanding state responsibility in education and increasing social control over all private educational institutions, both in terms of their fee structures and admission policies. The dangers of privatisation of educational institutions was highlighted by Prof Yashpal, while Prof Zoya Hasan emphasised the need for increasing access of minorities to state funded institutions and reducing their dependence on minority educational institutions.

The second session of the seminar focused on school education and was chaired by Arjun Dev (formerly of NCERT) and addressed by Jayati Ghosh (Jawaharlal Nehru University), Ashok Agarwal (Social Jurist), Ravi Kumar (Jamia Millia Islamia) and Mr Rajendran (School Teachers Federation of India). This session highlighted the problems in the Right to Education Act and the Minister’s proposal to make 10th class examinations optional. Prof Jayati Ghosh highlighted the silences within the Right to Education Act in terms of absence of financial responsibility of the state for providing education, and on the norms for educational institutions. Ashok Agarwal used his vast experience in dealing with private schools for evaluating the ways in which the current Right to Education Bill created and institutionalised a discriminatory system against disadvantaged groups and diluted Article 45 of the Constitution guaranteeing right to education to all children from 0-14 years. This aspect was also taken up by Mr Rajendran who stressed the need to include children from 0-6 years within the ambit of the act and the need to struggle against the current neo-liberal educational agenda through a broad mobilisation of ordinary people. He also demanded a National Commission on Education and a debate on Kapil Sibal’s proposals in the CABE so that the federal structure of education was respected. Ravi Kumar highlighted the basic contradiction between the goal of achieving an equitable educational system and the broader neo-liberal context and said that the Right to Education act needs to be seen in this context.

The third session of the seminar focused on higher education and was chaired by C.P Chandrasekhar ( Jawaharlal Nehru University ). Speakers in this session included Sudhanshu Bhattacharya (NEUPA), Dhruv Raina and Soumen Bhattacharya ( Jawaharlal Nehru University ), Vijender Sharma (Democratic Teachers Forum, Delhi University ), N Raghuram ( Indraprastha University ) and Dinesh Abrol (National Institute of Science Technology and Development Studies). The session highlighted the limitations of the National Knowledge Commission and Yashpal Committee with respect to their recommendations for reforming higher education. Sudhanshu Bhattacharya said that the government needed to set up a National Commission on Higher Education to check malpractices and privatisation of education. Vijender Sharma showed how the Yashpal Committee had created space for private education and why there was a need to oppose foreign investment in education. This could only be done by increasing social control over private capital. Dhruv Raina highlighted the need to democratise education and research in institutions of higher learning. Dinesh Abrol argued that technical education needed to be subservient to social goals and control and not to the market. Thus market and not overregulation was the problem. The seminar ended with a resolve to oppose the current neo-liberal agenda and called for a sustained fight to amend the right to education act for achieving equity in educational opportunities.

Press Release condemning ban

Date 3.08.2009
We are shocked to learn from press reports that the BJP government of Chhattisgarh has banned Charandas Chor, a classic of the modern Indian theatre, written and produced by Habib Tanvir. The play was first done in the 1970s, and is originally based on an oral folk tale from Rajasthan. Habib Tanvir worked on this tale, introducing into it elements of the art and beliefs of the Satnami community. Satnami singers and dancers have performed in this play, and it has been seen by members of the community several times. In Chhattisgarh and Madhya Pradesh, there are several rural troupes who are today performing some version of this play.

The play itself is the story of a thief who, under the influence of a guru, pledges never to tell a lie. He sticks to his pledge, even at the cost of his life. This superb tragic-comedy, in a thoroughly entertaining and artistic manner, brings into focus the moral and ethical degeneration of our society, in which, paradoxically, it is a thief who ends up being more honest than those who supposed to be the custodians of our morality.

Charandas Chor remains Habib Tanvir’s best-known play, and has been performed literally hundreds of times by his world-renowned Naya Theatre troupe all over India and in several countries across the world. It was made into a film by Shyam Benegal, with Smita Patil in the lead, in 1975, and was the first Indian play to win the prestigious Fringe First award at the Edinburgh Theatre Festival in 1982. It then did a successful run on the London stage.

We demand that the Chhattisgarh government immediately revoke this absurd ban.

Act One, M.K. Raina, Arvind Gaur, Moloyashree Hashmi, Asmita Theatre Group, N.K. Sharma, Bahroop Art Group, Sahmat, Brijesh, Shahid Anwar, Govind Deshpande, Sudhanva Deshpande, Jana Natya Manch, Vivan Sundaram, Jan Sanskriti, Wamiq Abbasi, Janvadi Lekhak Sangh, Javed Malick, Madangopal Singh

Press Statement Date 29.07.2009

We are deeply disturbed by attempts being made by interested quarters to take over several historically important and protected monuments in different parts of the country, in clear violation of The Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958, on the excuse of offering worship there. Many of the monument are parts of the precious legacy of the country and under the rules framed under the Ancient Monuments Act, there can be no installation of worship wherever it had ceased.

We call upon the PM, who is also in-charge of the ministry of Culture to initiate immediate action to save these monuments from encroachment. We also call upon the Chief Minister of Delhi to rein in all such elements who are aiding and abetting the violation of the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958. We also call upon the authorities to initiate immediate steps to evict the encroachers and to take all steps to ensure the protection of all listed monuments. This should set a model for official action against law-breakers irrespective of the religious community or ritual concerned.

Irfan Habib, Ram Rahman, Amar Farooqui, D. N. Jha, Prabhat Shukla, Arjun Dev, Sohail Hashmi, Zahoor Siddiqui, Shireen Moosvi, Suraj Bhan, Suvira Jaiswal, Archana Prasad

Released to the press

To celebrate the life, theatre, politics and creativity of

Habib Tanvir

(1923-2009) join us at the memorial meeting at

6.00 p.m. 10 June 2009 Muktadhara Auditorium Banga Sanskriti Bhavan 18-19 Bhai Veer Singh Marg, near Gol Market

Jana Natya Manch Sahmat Janvadi Lekhak Sangh Directions: This is the road between Gol Market and St. Columba’s School. From south and east, take Ashok Road up to Gol Dak Khana, then Kali Bari Marg, and turn immediately right. From west and north, take Mandir Marg, Gol Market, turn right on Bhai Veer Singh Marg. Most bus routes for Shivaji Stadium take this road and will drop you in front of Muktdhara. From west and south-west, from RML Hospital, take Baba Kharag Singh Marg where there is the construction of the express metro, Gol Dak Khana, then left at Kali Bari Marg, and turn immediately right.
9868301864 (Sudhanva), 9868254822 (Moloyashree), 23711276 and 23351424 (Sahmat)

jananatyamanch@gmail.com, sahmat8@yahoo.com, jlscentre@yahoo.com

Statement
Habib Tanvir
, the legend of contemporary Indian theatre, was also a writer, poet, actor, organiser of progressive writers and people’s theatre - passed away on June 8, 2009 at Bhopal. Habib Tanvir, whose plays make him a true citizen of the world will always be remembered for his abiding commitment to the values of secularism and progressive ideas.

For us at SAHMAT, Habib Saheb was an inspiring presence as its founder trustee and its chairman after Bhisham Sahni’s passing away in 2003. His was one of the most militant voices in the spontaneous protest after Safdar Hashmi’s brutal murder in 1989. Habib Tanvir had earlier collaborated with Safdar Hashmi in dramatizing Premchand’s story

Mote Ram Ka Satyagraha”. Habib was an important organizer and participant in SAHMAT’s Hum Sab Ayodhya exhibition and the Mukt Naad cultural sit-in in Ayodhya in 1993, after the Babri Masjid demolition.

Habib Tanvir was born on September 1923 at Raipur, Chattisgarh. After initial education at Nagpur, he went to RADA in 1955 and travelled in Europe during 1956-57. He became the organiser, secretary, playwright and actor-director of IPTA during 1948-50.

In 1954 he had directed ‘Agra Bazar’ which he himself described as “the first serious experiment integrating song with drama and rural actors with urban” For the last 55 years Agra Bazar’ has been performed all over the country countless number of times. He founded Naya Theatre in 1958. Habib’s abiding contribution to contemporary culture will be his remarkable incorporation of traditions of folk and tribal theatre, music and language into his modern formal craft. The power of his plays delighted and moved audiences cutting across all class boundaries from the man on the street to the powerful elite.

During the last two decades Habib Tanvir had through his plays invited the ire of the Sangh Parivar and the reactionary forces for firmly standing against fundamentalism and obscurantism through plays like “Ponga Pandit”, “ Zamadarin”.

Habib Tanvir will be missed by progressive artists all over the country. His passing marks the end of an era.

To Nagin and the artists of Naya Theatre we convey our heart-felt condolences.


Statement on 14-04-2009

Press Statement on Tendentious Reporting in Media

We are deeply disturbed by the tendentious reports in the media of the Supreme Court proceedings on April 13 dealing with the S I T report on the Gujarat carnage of 2002.

This unhealthy trend in the media reporting is going to seriously compromise the credibility of the media and undermine “ freedom of expression” enjoyed by the media which we all cherish.

An impression being created in a section of the media that the former CBI director R K Raghvan who led the S I T has “told” the court that Teesta Setalvad “ cooked up macabre tales of wanton killing” is mischievious. Only the Supreme Court, the amicus curiae and the Gujarat government have access to the report. The S I T has not filed any other document in court to which the media has access nor was Mr. Raghvan in the Court. It is therefore obvious that the media is only uncritically reporting what the Gujarat government’s lawyer said in the note liberally distributed to the press outside the Court.

While the Supreme Court observed that there was no room for allegations and counter allegations at this late stage, the media coverage has brazenly flouted this observation by reporting the totally baseless allegations against social activist Teesta Setalvad and the organisation she represents Citizen for Justice and Peace on the basis of the Gujarat government’s note circulated in the Court. This is all the more reprehensible because Teesta Setalvad and Citizen for Justice and Peace have neither been given a copy of the S I T report nor has their response been sought in the matter.

The proceedings in the Supreme Court related to the response of the Gujarat government and the amicus curiae Shri Harish Salve to the S I T report. The very fact that the Supreme Court had to set up the S I T to correct the miscarriage of justice due to the tardy investigation by the state of Gujarat was highlighted in the court’s observation that but for the S I T investigation many more accused, who were freshly added, would not have been brought to book. It was the untiring efforts of Teesta Setalvad and the CJP and the National Human Rights Commission that persuaded the Supreme Court to set up the S I T and on the basis of its findings further arrests have been made of persons who held administrative and ministerial positions in the government of Gujarat.

M.K.Raina
for
SAHMAT

Statement on 23.3.2009

Open Letter to NDA Allies condemning Varun Gandhi’s hate speech

Press Release March 23, 2008

Open Letter to NDA Allies

The Citizens for Justice amd Peace (CJP) and SAHMAT urge the various allies who constitute the NDA coalition and who believe in Constitutional Governance to not only condemn outright, the communal hate-ridden speeches of Varun Gandhi while campaigning in Pilibhit in Uttar Pradesh but to ensure that the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) does not nominate him as a candidatefort he forthcoming Lok Sabha elections.

The letter has been written to Nitish Kumar of JD(U), Om Prakash Chautala Indian National Lok Dal, President Assom Gana Parishad and Ajit Singh of the RLD.

Varun Gandhi’s hate speech epitomises the core of the BJP’s supremist and ultra nationalist ideology that has always targeted India’s syncretic civilisational ethos and specifically (and crudely) targets Muslims, Christians and others sections of Indian.

The BJP’s core ideology stems from its politcal heart the Rashtryiya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and is openly being backed by the BJP party.

The allies of the NDA who swear by the Indian Constitution need need to make their position clear on Varun Gandhi’s speech and his possible prospective nomination as a Lok Sabha candidate from Pilibhit. Not to oppose his nomination and candiadture as Lok Sabha candidate is to support not just Varun Gandhi but the BJP that has grown from strength to strength through flagrant violations of the Indian Constitution and the rule of law.

In the past, prime minsterial aspirant Shri LK Advani has been known to have indulged in similar hate mongering (en route to Ayodhya in December 1992); senior party leaders like Shri Murli Manohar Joshi have also committed similar offences; Gujarat chief minister Naremdra Modi’s statements on the internally displaced refugees livng in pathetic conditions in relief camps of the state in 2002 were not just violations of the law, but shocking; fratermal organisations like the Vishwa Hindu Parisgad (VHP) and the Bajrang Dal (BD) have taken the entire content and tempo of hate speech to the levels of a cynical game and continue to indulge in these criminal violations because they escape the long arms of the law.

It is about time that all those political players who have a stake in the future of Indian democracy, who are fighting the elections and especially those who have in the past and still continue to support the BJP-driven NDA come clean on Varun Gandhi’s speech and oppose his nomination as a BJP canbdidate. Not to do so would be to support the content of the violence ridden speech made by him.

Teesta Setalvad, Javed Akhtar, Javed Anand, Rahul Bose, Vivan Sundaram, Ram Rahman, MK Raina, Shakti Kjak, Archana Prasad, Madhu Prasad, CP Chandrashekhar, Indira Chandrashekhar, Badri Raina, Prabhat Patnaik, Utsa Patnaik, Chanchal Chauhan

Minister of Information & Broadcasting
Govt. of India
New Delhi
Dear Minister,

We are deeply shocked at the decision to cancel the screening of a documentary made by the eminent Indian painter M.F. Husain, after it had been scheduled for November 25 at the ongoing International Film Festival of India in Goa. We are also profoundly alarmed at the wider implications of this act of blatant censorship imposed on artistic production. You are surely aware of the background to this decision by the Directorate of Film Festivals. On November 22, the Hindu Janajagruti Samiti (HJS) and an affiliated body that calls itself the Sanatan Sanstha, petitioned the chief minister of Goa and the director of the film festival, urging that the screening be cancelled since it involved a person who had allegedly caused offence to the “religious and National sentiments of crores of Hindus and Indians (sic)”. Almost at the same time, activists of the same two bodies carried out a series of protests in the city of Mumbai, in the vicinity of the Films Division office. As the website of the HJS puts it: they made a “representation with a warning” to the Films Division officials, about the plan to screen the Husain documentary. Then, in the narration on the HJS website: the official at Mumbai had “a long discussion with the Chief Officers in the Film Division”, “tried to contact the officers in Goa and New Dehli (sic) again and again and finally told the delegation at 3.30 in the evening that the screening of the abovementioned film was cancelled”. The craven and unprincipled capitulation by the film festival organisers has been portrayed by the HJS as “one more feather” in its cap (http://www.hindujagruti.org/news/5830.html). At the same time, the official response has been to either feign ignorance or pretend that the issue is of little consequence. The chief minister of Goa has reportedly said that he had no knowledge of the entire process and the director of film festivals has taken the position that the screening was being “deferred”. Frankly, we are appalled at this abject failure of principle and the thorough abdication of responsibility by officials entrusted with safeguarding the autonomy of cultural and artistic production. The HJS and its affiliated organisation, the Sanatan Sanstha are, as you would know, under investigation by police and intelligence agencies for their possible complicity in a number of terrorist actions in the country. Indeed, the option of declaring them “unlawful” organisations, is reportedly under active consideration. You would also be aware that the HJS has for years been the central switching-board for a number of cases against M.F. Husain, lodged on the grounds of “obscenity”, “causing ill-will on grounds of religion” and “incitement”. This entire range of charges was considered by the Delhi High Court and in a historic verdict of May 8, held to be completely without substance. The Delhi High Court finding was upheld by the Supreme Court. However, the HJS and its associates have managed to effectively mobilise a sufficient number of complainants scattered all over the country, and the Supreme Court is yet to decide on a petition requesting that all cases be brought within its jurisdiction. You would appreciate then, that the continuing harassment of one of India’s greatest living artists, is a consequence of technical procedures involved in the administration of justice and most importantly, the failure of the administrative authorities to stand up to the coercive strategies of bodies that are currently under investigation for terrorism offences. We urge you to reflect upon the consequences that this would have, for the faith that the common man places in the system of administration he lives under. We urge you moreover, to reflect upon the consequences for artistic production in this country. Husain’s documentary was produced in 1967 and has been widely recognised and awarded by the most discerning judges. It is a sad day for creative activity everywhere, when work of such calibre is deprived of an audience, because of the power of the mob. In the interests of cultural freedom, we urge you to rescind the ban on Husain and allow his documentary to be screened at the ongoing film festival. In anticipation,

Yours,

Vivan SundaramRam Rahman

ATTACK ON SAHMAT exhibition!

Protest meeting at 11 am on 25 August, at SAHMAT

SAHMAT had organized an exhibition of reproductions of eminent artist M.F. Husain’s works on 22, 23 and 24 August 2008, to coincide with the three-day Art Fair at the India Art Summit, Pragati Maidan, Delhi , at which galleries had been advised not to show the artist’s work. The exhibition had on display, apart from reproductions of Husain’s paintings, eight photographs of Husain by Parthiv Shah, two photographs of Husain painting a hoarding by Madan Mahatta, and three photographs from Husain’s ‘Mughal-e-Azam’ series from the Village Art Gallery, Delhi.

On Sunday, 24 August, at around 3.30 pm, the exhibition, which was being held in a shamiana outside the SAHMAT office, was attacked and vandalised by 8 to 10 miscreants. The television channel ETV, whose crew was present, has recorded the entire episode. The vandals ran away from the scene after destroying the framed photographs and prints, a television set and DVD player (on which Husain’s films were being screened), and furniture. The artist Arpana Caur, and Anil Chandra and Santosh Sharma, SAHMAT members, were witnesses to the episode.

In protest against the attack on SAHMAT and the vandalism, the exhibition has been extended, in ‘as-is’, vandalised condition, for a day – till the evening of 25 August.

A meeting to protest against this cowardly attack, and the attempt on the part of rightwing forces to impose a narrow, majoritarian view of our culture, was held on Monday, 25 August, at 11 am, outside the SAHMAT office at 8 Vithalbhai Patel House, Rafi Marg. Those present at the protest meeting, and those who have sent messages of solidarity, include:


Abhijeet Tamhane, Aditi Magaldas, Aditi Raina, Ajay Srivastava, Akila Jayaraman, Albeena Shakil, Ali Abbas Yakutpura, Aman Farooqi, Amar Farooqi, Anant Raina, Anil Chandra, Anjali Raina, Anup Karar, Arpana Caur, Asad Zaidi, Ashalata, Ashok Kumari, Ashok Rao, Aziz Ahmed Khan, Badri Raina, Bani Joshi, Brinda Karat, C.P. Chandrasekhar, Chanchal Chauhan, Dadi Pudumjee, Danish Ali, Dayanand Singh, Dhiresh, Faizan Farooqi, Gautam Navlakha, Geeta Kapur, Geetanjali Shree, Hannan Mollah, Inder Salim, Indira Chandrasekhar, Irfan Habib, Jatin Das, Jauhar Kanungo, Javed Malick, Javed Naqvi, Jayati Ghosh, K. Bikram Singh, Kalpana Sahni, Kamakumar Hirawat, Kanishka Prasad, Kanti Mohan, Kumi Chandra, Lima Kanungo, M.K. Raina, M.M.P. Singh, Madan Gopal Singh, Madhu Prasad, Maimoona Mollah, Manjira Datta, Martand Khosla, Mithilesh Srivastav, N.D. Jayaprakash, N.K. Sharma, N.S. Arjun, Nalini Taneja, Nandita Narayan, Nandita Rao, Naslima Shahana, Neeraj Malick, Nilotpal Basu, Nina Rao, P. Madhu, P.K. Shukla, Parth Tiwari,
Parthiv Shah, Prabhat Patnaik, Preeti Bawa, Pushpamala N., Qausar Hashmi, Radhika Menon, Rahul Verma, Raj Chauhan, Rajendra Prasad, Rajendra Usapkar, Rajinder Arora, Rajinder Sharma, Rajiv Jha, Rajni B. Arora, Ram Nivas Tyagi, Ram Rahman, Riyaz Ahmed Bhat, Romi Khosla, S. Kalidas, S.M. Mishra, Saeed Akhtar Mirza, Sahba Farooqi, Sahba Husain, Sahiram, Samar S. Jodha, Sania Hashmi, Santosh Sharma, Sashi Kumar, Shabi Ahmad, Shakeel Ahmed, Shamim Farooqi, Shamshad, , Shamsul Islam, Shankar Chandra, Shanta Chopra,
Sheena Bhalla, Shireen Moosvi, Shruti Singhi, Shubha Mudgal, Sitaram Yechury, Sohail Hashmi, Sravan Kumar, Subhashini Ali, Sudha Sundararaman, Sudhir Chandra, Sudhir Suman, Sukumar Muraleedharan, Suneet Chopra, T.S. Johar, Utsa Patnaik, Uzma Mollah, V. Srinivasa Rao, Vandana Sharma, Veer Munshi, Vidya Shah, Vijay S. Jodha, Vijender Sharma, Vivan Sundaram.

Press Statement

We are surprised and unhappy at the decision of the organisers of the first India Art Summit to exclude the works of MF Husain from the displays of all the participating galleries from across India . The Art summit and three day fair, which opens at the Trade Fair venue in Delhi on the 22nd, is also supported by the Ministry of Culture. While the organisers may have made this decision out of a fear of attacks or protests against the work of Husain, by giving in to such threats by extremist political groups, they are playing into the hands of these forces. It is the duty of the state and the police to protect our institutions and citizens against threats of violence and surely the Trade Fair authorities and the Delhi police are capable of confronting any such threat. An earlier exhibit by Husain continued at the India International Centre last December under just such assurances by the Delhi police.For the artists community, Husain is the reigning father-figure, commanding enormous respect. In fact, Husain has been single-handedly responsible for putting Indian art on the world map and equally responsible for creating the world market boom in Indian art, without which such a summit and fair would not be taking place in Delhi at this moment. It is therefore deeply ironical that his work is being excluded by dictat. We request the organisers to rethink this decision. In solidarity with Husain, Sahmat will show Images of his work on all three days of the summit outside its office at 8 Vithalbhai Patel House, Rafi Marg. We invite all the citizens of Delhi and all artists to come view his work at Sahmat.
Ram Rahman, MK Raina, Madan Gopal Singh, Sohail Hashmi, Parthiv Shah, Vivan Sundaram, Indira Chandrasekhar, Geeta Kapur, K Bikram Singh